Angola vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland
Angola
1,351 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
1,350 current US$
in 2020
Angola rank
70th
Suriname rank
71st
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time
- Angola
- Suriname
How they compare
Angola currently reports 1,351 current US$ against 1,350 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 1 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.
Angola ranks 70th and Suriname ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 388.25 current US$ | 1,008 current US$ | 619.32 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2000s | 963.96 current US$ | 826.39 current US$ | 137.57 current US$ | Angola |
| 2010s | 1,912 current US$ | 1,497 current US$ | 415.5 current US$ | Angola |
| 2020s | 1,351 current US$ | 1,350 current US$ | 1.6 current US$ | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, Angola or Suriname?
- Angola, at 1,351 current US$ against 1,350 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between Angola and Suriname?
- 1 current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Angola and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
- Angola ranks 70th and Suriname ranks 71st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.