Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem
Sweden
9.54 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
8.50 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sweden rank
16th
Zimbabwe rank
18th
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time
- Sweden
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 9.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 8.50 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.03 billion real chained 2019 US$.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 151 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 9.02 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 568.50 million real chained 2019 US$ | Sweden |
| 2000s | 9.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 8.85 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 733.36 million real chained 2019 US$ | Sweden |
| 2010s | 9.55 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 8.63 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 918.88 million real chained 2019 US$ | Sweden |
| 2020s | 9.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 8.50 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 1.03 billion real chained 2019 US$ | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
- Sweden, at 9.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 8.50 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
- 1.03 billion real chained 2019 US$, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
- Sweden ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.