Guatemala vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Guatemala
1.00 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
1.07 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
74th
Namibia rank
71st

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Guatemala
  • Namibia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1.07 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 1.00 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 69.50 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 74th and Namibia ranks 71st of 151 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ 90.82 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 1.13 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ 115.75 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 1.03 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.13 billion real chained 2019 US$ 107.66 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 1.00 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.07 billion real chained 2019 US$ 69.50 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Guatemala or Namibia?
Namibia, at 1.07 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 1.00 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Guatemala as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Guatemala and Namibia?
69.50 million real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Guatemala ranks 74th and Namibia ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019/guatemala/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019/guatemala/namibia/">Guatemala vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed