Botswana vs Chile: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Botswana
2.95 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile
3.22 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Botswana rank
44th
Chile rank
41st

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Botswana
  • Chile
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199520072020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3.22 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.95 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Botswana, a difference of 270.08 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 44th and Chile ranks 41st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 3.48 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.77 billion real chained 2019 US$ 710.28 million real chained 2019 US$ Botswana
2000s 3.31 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.87 billion real chained 2019 US$ 435.96 million real chained 2019 US$ Botswana
2010s 3.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.09 billion real chained 2019 US$ 10.96 million real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2020s 2.95 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.22 billion real chained 2019 US$ 270.08 million real chained 2019 US$ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Botswana or Chile?
Chile, at 3.22 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.95 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Botswana as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Botswana and Chile?
270.08 million real chained 2019 US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Botswana and Chile rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Botswana ranks 44th and Chile ranks 41st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Chile: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019/botswana/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019/botswana/chile/">Botswana vs Chile: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed