Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Bosnia and Herzegovina
259.89 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
265.34 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
113th
Serbia rank
112th

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Serbia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 265.34 million real chained 2019 US$ against 259.89 million real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 5.45 million real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 113th and Serbia ranks 112th of 151 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 249.97 million real chained 2019 US$ 259.47 million real chained 2019 US$ 9.49 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 255.74 million real chained 2019 US$ 264.92 million real chained 2019 US$ 9.19 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 259.89 million real chained 2019 US$ 265.34 million real chained 2019 US$ 5.45 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
Serbia, at 265.34 million real chained 2019 US$ against 259.89 million real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
5.45 million real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 113th and Serbia ranks 112th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed