Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Sweden
9.64 billion current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
8.66 billion current US$
in 2020
Sweden rank
16th
Zimbabwe rank
18th

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 9.64 billion current US$ against 8.66 billion current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 985.09 million current US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Sweden ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 149 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 7.80 billion current US$ 5.36 billion current US$ 2.44 billion current US$ Sweden
2000s 7.95 billion current US$ 6.14 billion current US$ 1.81 billion current US$ Sweden
2010s 8.93 billion current US$ 7.62 billion current US$ 1.30 billion current US$ Sweden
2020s 9.64 billion current US$ 8.66 billion current US$ 985.09 million current US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Sweden, at 9.64 billion current US$ against 8.66 billion current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
985.09 million current US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Sweden ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed