Sao Tome and Principe vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Sao Tome and Principe
21.72 million current US$
in 2020
Singapore
23.08 million current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe rank
141st
Singapore rank
140th

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Singapore
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M199520072020

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 23.08 million current US$ against 21.72 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.36 million current US$.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st and Singapore ranks 140th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 12.90 million current US$ 9.08 million current US$ 3.82 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 11.48 million current US$ 4.20 million current US$ 7.28 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 20.43 million current US$ 16.63 million current US$ 3.80 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 21.72 million current US$ 23.08 million current US$ 1.36 million current US$ Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Sao Tome and Principe or Singapore?
Singapore, at 23.08 million current US$ against 21.72 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore?
1.36 million current US$, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st and Singapore ranks 140th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/sao-tome-and-principe/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/sao-tome-and-principe/singapore/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed