Malawi vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Malawi
653.53 million current US$
in 2020
Suriname
568.18 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
89th
Suriname rank
92nd

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Malawi
  • Suriname
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 653.53 million current US$ against 568.18 million current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 85.35 million current US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 89th and Suriname ranks 92nd of 149 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 308.96 million current US$ 277.21 million current US$ 31.75 million current US$ Malawi
2000s 444.16 million current US$ 398.54 million current US$ 45.62 million current US$ Malawi
2010s 632.13 million current US$ 520.96 million current US$ 111.17 million current US$ Malawi
2020s 653.53 million current US$ 568.18 million current US$ 85.35 million current US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Malawi or Suriname?
Malawi, at 653.53 million current US$ against 568.18 million current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Malawi and Suriname?
85.35 million current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Malawi ranks 89th and Suriname ranks 92nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/malawi/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/malawi/suriname/">Malawi vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed