Latvia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Latvia
486.77 million current US$
in 2020
Suriname
568.18 million current US$
in 2020
Latvia rank
94th
Suriname rank
92nd

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Latvia
  • Suriname
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 568.18 million current US$ against 486.77 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 81.41 million current US$.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 94th and Suriname ranks 92nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 445.24 million current US$ 277.21 million current US$ 168.03 million current US$ Latvia
2000s 410.00 million current US$ 398.54 million current US$ 11.45 million current US$ Latvia
2010s 444.35 million current US$ 520.96 million current US$ 76.62 million current US$ Suriname
2020s 486.77 million current US$ 568.18 million current US$ 81.41 million current US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Latvia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 568.18 million current US$ against 486.77 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Latvia and Suriname?
81.41 million current US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Latvia ranks 94th and Suriname ranks 92nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/latvia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/latvia/suriname/">Latvia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed