Iceland vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Iceland
27.50 million current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
21.72 million current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
139th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
141st

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Iceland
  • Sao Tome and Principe
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 27.50 million current US$ against 21.72 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 5.78 million current US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Iceland ranks 139th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 9.31 million current US$ 12.90 million current US$ 3.58 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 12.99 million current US$ 11.48 million current US$ 1.51 million current US$ Iceland
2010s 23.50 million current US$ 20.43 million current US$ 3.06 million current US$ Iceland
2020s 27.50 million current US$ 21.72 million current US$ 5.78 million current US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Iceland or Sao Tome and Principe?
Iceland, at 27.50 million current US$ against 21.72 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Iceland and Sao Tome and Principe?
5.78 million current US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iceland and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Iceland ranks 139th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/iceland/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/iceland/sao-tome-and-principe/">Iceland vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed