Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Guinea-Bissau
616.33 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi
653.53 million current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
91st
Malawi rank
89th

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Malawi
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 653.53 million current US$ against 616.33 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 37.21 million current US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 91st and Malawi ranks 89th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 527.18 million current US$ 308.96 million current US$ 218.22 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 580.87 million current US$ 444.16 million current US$ 136.70 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 584.71 million current US$ 632.13 million current US$ 47.42 million current US$ Malawi
2020s 616.33 million current US$ 653.53 million current US$ 37.21 million current US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Guinea-Bissau or Malawi?
Malawi, at 653.53 million current US$ against 616.33 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Guinea-Bissau and Malawi?
37.21 million current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 91st and Malawi ranks 89th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/guinea-bissau/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/guinea-bissau/malawi/">Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed