Georgia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Georgia
257.26 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia
267.89 million current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
114th
Serbia rank
112th

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Georgia
  • Serbia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 267.89 million current US$ against 257.26 million current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 10.63 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 114th and Serbia ranks 112th of 149 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 220.19 million current US$ 208.32 million current US$ 11.86 million current US$ Georgia
2010s 238.35 million current US$ 240.15 million current US$ 1.80 million current US$ Serbia
2020s 257.26 million current US$ 267.89 million current US$ 10.63 million current US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Georgia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 267.89 million current US$ against 257.26 million current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Georgia and Serbia?
10.63 million current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Georgia ranks 114th and Serbia ranks 112th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/georgia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/georgia/serbia/">Georgia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed