Comoros vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Comoros
13.87 million current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
21.72 million current US$
in 2020
Comoros rank
142nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
141st

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Comoros
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199520072020

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 21.72 million current US$ against 13.87 million current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 7.85 million current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.6 times Comoros's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 142nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 149 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 10.78 million current US$ 12.90 million current US$ 2.12 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 8.11 million current US$ 11.48 million current US$ 3.37 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 14.19 million current US$ 20.43 million current US$ 6.24 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 13.87 million current US$ 21.72 million current US$ 7.85 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Comoros or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 21.72 million current US$ against 13.87 million current US$ in Comoros as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Comoros and Sao Tome and Principe?
7.85 million current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Comoros and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Comoros ranks 142nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/comoros/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/comoros/sao-tome-and-principe/">Comoros vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed