Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem

Colombia
8.40 billion current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
8.66 billion current US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
18th

Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8.66 billion current US$ against 8.40 billion current US$ in Colombia, a difference of 258.37 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 6.58 billion current US$ 5.36 billion current US$ 1.22 billion current US$ Colombia
2000s 7.20 billion current US$ 6.14 billion current US$ 1.05 billion current US$ Colombia
2010s 8.06 billion current US$ 7.62 billion current US$ 432.65 million current US$ Colombia
2020s 8.40 billion current US$ 8.66 billion current US$ 258.37 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8.66 billion current US$ against 8.40 billion current US$ in Colombia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
258.37 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem?
Colombia ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current-us/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed