Mauritania vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, mangroves

Mauritania
478.72 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
381.19 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mauritania rank
36th
Sri Lanka rank
39th

Renewable natural capital, mangroves over time

  • Mauritania
  • Sri Lanka
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 478.72 million real chained 2019 US$ against 381.19 million real chained 2019 US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 97.53 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Mauritania ranks 36th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 445.21 million real chained 2019 US$ 532.16 million real chained 2019 US$ 86.95 million real chained 2019 US$ Sri Lanka
2000s 428.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 442.87 million real chained 2019 US$ 14.35 million real chained 2019 US$ Sri Lanka
2010s 444.20 million real chained 2019 US$ 386.56 million real chained 2019 US$ 57.64 million real chained 2019 US$ Mauritania
2020s 478.72 million real chained 2019 US$ 381.19 million real chained 2019 US$ 97.53 million real chained 2019 US$ Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, mangroves, Mauritania or Sri Lanka?
Mauritania, at 478.72 million real chained 2019 US$ against 381.19 million real chained 2019 US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, mangroves between Mauritania and Sri Lanka?
97.53 million real chained 2019 US$, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mauritania and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital, mangroves?
Mauritania ranks 36th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/mauritania/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/mauritania/sri-lanka/">Mauritania vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.