Luxembourg vs Nepal: Renewable natural capital, mangroves

Luxembourg
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Nepal
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Luxembourg rank
64th
Nepal rank
64th

Renewable natural capital, mangroves over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Nepal
00.20.40.60.81199520072020

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Nepal, a difference of 0 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 64th and Nepal ranks 64th of 151 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2000s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2010s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2020s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, mangroves, Luxembourg or Nepal?
Luxembourg, at 0 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Nepal as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, mangroves between Luxembourg and Nepal?
0 real chained 2019 US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Nepal?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Luxembourg and Nepal rank globally for renewable natural capital, mangroves?
Luxembourg ranks 64th and Nepal ranks 64th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Nepal: Renewable natural capital, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/luxembourg/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/luxembourg/nepal/">Luxembourg vs Nepal: Renewable natural capital, mangroves</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.