Guatemala vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital, mangroves

Guatemala
100.97 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sierra Leone
77.79 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
55th
Sierra Leone rank
56th

Renewable natural capital, mangroves over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sierra Leone
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M199520072020

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 100.97 million real chained 2019 US$ against 77.79 million real chained 2019 US$ in Sierra Leone, a difference of 23.18 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.3 times Sierra Leone's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 55th and Sierra Leone ranks 56th of 151 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s 101.31 million real chained 2019 US$ 82.02 million real chained 2019 US$ 19.28 million real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2000s 100.62 million real chained 2019 US$ 81.56 million real chained 2019 US$ 19.06 million real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2010s 100.18 million real chained 2019 US$ 80.60 million real chained 2019 US$ 19.58 million real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2020s 100.97 million real chained 2019 US$ 77.79 million real chained 2019 US$ 23.18 million real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, mangroves, Guatemala or Sierra Leone?
Guatemala, at 100.97 million real chained 2019 US$ against 77.79 million real chained 2019 US$ in Sierra Leone as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, mangroves between Guatemala and Sierra Leone?
23.18 million real chained 2019 US$, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sierra Leone?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Sierra Leone rank globally for renewable natural capital, mangroves?
Guatemala ranks 55th and Sierra Leone ranks 56th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/sierra-leone/">Guatemala vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.