Bulgaria vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, mangroves

Bulgaria
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bulgaria rank
64th
Zimbabwe rank
64th

Renewable natural capital, mangroves over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81199520072020

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 0 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 151 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2000s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2010s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2020s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, mangroves, Bulgaria or Zimbabwe?
Bulgaria, at 0 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, mangroves between Bulgaria and Zimbabwe?
0 real chained 2019 US$, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bulgaria and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, mangroves?
Bulgaria ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/bulgaria/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/bulgaria/zimbabwe/">Bulgaria vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, mangroves</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.