Congo vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, mangroves
Congo
41.33 million current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
60th
Zimbabwe rank
63rd
Renewable natural capital, mangroves over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 41.33 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 41.33 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Congo ranks 60th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 150 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2010s | 15.75 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 15.75 million current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 41.33 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 41.33 million current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, mangroves, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Congo, at 41.33 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, mangroves between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 41.33 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, mangroves?
- Congo ranks 60th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.