Congo vs Maldives: Renewable natural capital, mangroves

Congo
41.33 million current US$
in 2020
Maldives
0 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
60th
Maldives rank
63rd

Renewable natural capital, mangroves over time

  • Congo
  • Maldives
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 41.33 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Maldives, a difference of 41.33 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Maldives ahead.

Congo ranks 60th and Maldives ranks 63rd of 150 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Maldives Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$
2000s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$
2010s 15.75 million current US$ 0 current US$ 15.75 million current US$ Congo
2020s 41.33 million current US$ 0 current US$ 41.33 million current US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, mangroves, Congo or Maldives?
Congo, at 41.33 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Maldives as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, mangroves between Congo and Maldives?
41.33 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Maldives?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Maldives rank globally for renewable natural capital, mangroves?
Congo ranks 60th and Maldives ranks 63rd of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, mangroves (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed