Israel vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Israel
537.18 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan
429.56 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Israel rank
120th
Kyrgyzstan rank
123rd

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Israel
  • Kyrgyzstan
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Israel currently reports 537.18 million real chained 2019 US$ against 429.56 million real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 107.62 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 120th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 123rd of 151 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 562.89 million real chained 2019 US$ 381.29 million real chained 2019 US$ 181.60 million real chained 2019 US$ Israel
2000s 588.79 million real chained 2019 US$ 392.81 million real chained 2019 US$ 195.98 million real chained 2019 US$ Israel
2010s 582.08 million real chained 2019 US$ 409.43 million real chained 2019 US$ 172.65 million real chained 2019 US$ Israel
2020s 537.18 million real chained 2019 US$ 429.56 million real chained 2019 US$ 107.62 million real chained 2019 US$ Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Israel or Kyrgyzstan?
Israel, at 537.18 million real chained 2019 US$ against 429.56 million real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Israel and Kyrgyzstan?
107.62 million real chained 2019 US$, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Kyrgyzstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Israel and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Israel ranks 120th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 123rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/israel/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/israel/kyrgyz-republic/">Israel vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed