Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Guatemala
5.59 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
57th
Zimbabwe rank
60th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Guatemala
  • Zimbabwe
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199520072020

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 5.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 258.42 million real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 151 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 6.95 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.66 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.29 billion real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2000s 6.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.55 billion real chained 2019 US$ 773.32 million real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2010s 5.73 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.41 billion real chained 2019 US$ 319.58 million real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2020s 5.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ 258.42 million real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Guatemala or Zimbabwe?
Guatemala, at 5.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
258.42 million real chained 2019 US$, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Guatemala ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/zimbabwe/">Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed