Egypt vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Egypt
3.11 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
787,645 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
144th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
146th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Egypt
  • Sao Tome and Principe
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M199520072020

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 3.11 million real chained 2019 US$ against 787,645 real chained 2019 US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.33 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Egypt's figure about 4.0 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 144th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 146th of 151 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 3.78 million real chained 2019 US$ 886,867 real chained 2019 US$ 2.89 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2000s 4.30 million real chained 2019 US$ 883,907 real chained 2019 US$ 3.42 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2010s 3.62 million real chained 2019 US$ 839,396 real chained 2019 US$ 2.78 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2020s 3.11 million real chained 2019 US$ 787,645 real chained 2019 US$ 2.33 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Egypt or Sao Tome and Principe?
Egypt, at 3.11 million real chained 2019 US$ against 787,645 real chained 2019 US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe?
2.33 million real chained 2019 US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Egypt ranks 144th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 146th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/egypt-arab-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/egypt-arab-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Egypt vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed