Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Costa Rica
4.68 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
62nd
Zimbabwe rank
60th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Zimbabwe
02.0B4.0B6.0B199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 4.68 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Costa Rica, a difference of 658.32 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 62nd and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 151 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 4.43 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.66 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.23 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 4.41 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.55 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.14 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 4.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.41 billion real chained 2019 US$ 874.57 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 4.68 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ 658.32 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 4.68 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Costa Rica as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
658.32 million real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Costa Rica ranks 62nd and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/costa-rica/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/costa-rica/zimbabwe/">Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed