China vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

China
399.76 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Russian Federation
246.65 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China rank
3rd
Russian Federation rank
5th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • China
  • Russian Federation
0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B199520072020

How they compare

China currently reports 399.76 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 246.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Russian Federation, a difference of 153.11 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.6 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 151 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 310.83 billion real chained 2019 US$ 244.79 billion real chained 2019 US$ 66.04 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2000s 340.96 billion real chained 2019 US$ 245.62 billion real chained 2019 US$ 95.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2010s 380.50 billion real chained 2019 US$ 246.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ 133.91 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2020s 399.76 billion real chained 2019 US$ 246.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ 153.11 billion real chained 2019 US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, China or Russian Federation?
China, at 399.76 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 246.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Russian Federation as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between China and Russian Federation?
153.11 billion real chained 2019 US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do China and Russian Federation rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
China ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/china/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/china/russian-federation/">China vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed