Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.98 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
1.96 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
96th
Serbia rank
97th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Serbia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1.98 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 1.96 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 28.13 million real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Serbia ranks 97th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.91 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.91 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.27 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 1.95 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.95 billion real chained 2019 US$ 495,000 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 1.98 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.96 billion real chained 2019 US$ 28.13 million real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1.98 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 1.96 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
28.13 million real chained 2019 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Serbia ranks 97th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed