Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services
Belarus
5.48 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
58th
Zimbabwe rank
60th
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Belarus
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 5.48 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 140.50 million real chained 2019 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Belarus ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 5.66 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 584.92 million real chained 2019 US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 5.27 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 5.55 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 286.51 million real chained 2019 US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 5.42 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 5.41 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 3.03 million real chained 2019 US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 5.48 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ | 140.50 million real chained 2019 US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
- Belarus, at 5.48 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 5.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
- 140.50 million real chained 2019 US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
- Belarus ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.