Armenia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Armenia
313.05 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
362.71 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Armenia rank
130th
Guinea-Bissau rank
127th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Armenia
  • Guinea-Bissau
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 362.71 million real chained 2019 US$ against 313.05 million real chained 2019 US$ in Armenia, a difference of 49.67 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 130th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 127th of 151 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 317.62 million real chained 2019 US$ 398.29 million real chained 2019 US$ 80.67 million real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 316.13 million real chained 2019 US$ 386.69 million real chained 2019 US$ 70.56 million real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 314.14 million real chained 2019 US$ 371.22 million real chained 2019 US$ 57.08 million real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 313.05 million real chained 2019 US$ 362.71 million real chained 2019 US$ 49.67 million real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Armenia or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 362.71 million real chained 2019 US$ against 313.05 million real chained 2019 US$ in Armenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Armenia and Guinea-Bissau?
49.67 million real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Armenia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Armenia ranks 130th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 127th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/armenia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/armenia/guinea-bissau/">Armenia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed