Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Guinea-Bissau
372.59 million current US$
in 2020
Solomon Islands
376.43 million current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
127th
Solomon Islands rank
126th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Solomon Islands
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199520072020

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 376.43 million current US$ against 372.59 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 3.84 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 127th and Solomon Islands ranks 126th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 158.38 million current US$ 120.18 million current US$ 38.20 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 153.82 million current US$ 134.99 million current US$ 18.83 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 301.40 million current US$ 322.50 million current US$ 21.10 million current US$ Solomon Islands
2020s 372.59 million current US$ 376.43 million current US$ 3.84 million current US$ Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Guinea-Bissau or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 376.43 million current US$ against 372.59 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands?
3.84 million current US$, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 127th and Solomon Islands ranks 126th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/guinea-bissau/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/guinea-bissau/solomon-islands/">Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed