Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Costa Rica
4.71 billion current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
5.27 billion current US$
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
61st
Zimbabwe rank
59th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Zimbabwe
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 5.27 billion current US$ against 4.71 billion current US$ in Costa Rica, a difference of 561.63 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 2.78 billion current US$ 1.84 billion current US$ 941.27 million current US$ Costa Rica
2000s 3.04 billion current US$ 1.52 billion current US$ 1.52 billion current US$ Costa Rica
2010s 4.16 billion current US$ 4.80 billion current US$ 636.51 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 4.71 billion current US$ 5.27 billion current US$ 561.63 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 5.27 billion current US$ against 4.71 billion current US$ in Costa Rica as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
561.63 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Costa Rica ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/costa-rica/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/costa-rica/zimbabwe/">Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed