Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.01 billion current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
2.16 billion current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
96th
Sri Lanka rank
93rd

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sri Lanka
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199520072020

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 2.16 billion current US$ against 2.01 billion current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 144.72 million current US$.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 149 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 839.42 million current US$ 1.52 billion current US$ 684.16 million current US$ Sri Lanka
2000s 1.47 billion current US$ 1.57 billion current US$ 101.84 million current US$ Sri Lanka
2010s 1.79 billion current US$ 1.95 billion current US$ 156.93 million current US$ Sri Lanka
2020s 2.01 billion current US$ 2.16 billion current US$ 144.72 million current US$ Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 2.16 billion current US$ against 2.01 billion current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
144.72 million current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sri-lanka/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed