Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services

Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.01 billion current US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
1.76 billion current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
96th
Kazakhstan rank
98th

Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Kazakhstan
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2.01 billion current US$ against 1.76 billion current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 255.25 million current US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 839.42 million current US$ 1.06 billion current US$ 220.96 million current US$ Kazakhstan
2000s 1.47 billion current US$ 1.25 billion current US$ 218.94 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.79 billion current US$ 1.50 billion current US$ 294.04 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 2.01 billion current US$ 1.76 billion current US$ 255.25 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kazakhstan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2.01 billion current US$ against 1.76 billion current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
255.25 million current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kazakhstan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed