United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
13.55 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
15.69 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
24th
Zambia rank
22nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Zambia
05.0B10.0B15.0B199520072020

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 15.69 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 13.55 billion real chained 2019 US$ in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 2.14 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 24th and Zambia ranks 22nd of 151 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 12.32 billion real chained 2019 US$ 16.51 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2000s 12.75 billion real chained 2019 US$ 16.42 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.67 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2010s 13.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ 16.06 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.75 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2020s 13.55 billion real chained 2019 US$ 15.69 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.14 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or Zambia?
Zambia, at 15.69 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 13.55 billion real chained 2019 US$ in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Zambia?
2.14 billion real chained 2019 US$, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 24th and Zambia ranks 22nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/united-kingdom/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/united-kingdom/zambia/">United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed