Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Tajikistan
131.98 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
208.97 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tajikistan rank
128th
Zimbabwe rank
125th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Zimbabwe
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 208.97 million real chained 2019 US$ against 131.98 million real chained 2019 US$ in Tajikistan, a difference of 76.99 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Tajikistan's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Tajikistan ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 151 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 127.49 million real chained 2019 US$ 221.66 million real chained 2019 US$ 94.17 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 127.68 million real chained 2019 US$ 217.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 89.84 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 130.28 million real chained 2019 US$ 212.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 81.72 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 131.98 million real chained 2019 US$ 208.97 million real chained 2019 US$ 76.99 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Tajikistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 208.97 million real chained 2019 US$ against 131.98 million real chained 2019 US$ in Tajikistan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Tajikistan and Zimbabwe?
76.99 million real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Tajikistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Tajikistan ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/tajikistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/tajikistan/zimbabwe/">Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed