Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Namibia
328.04 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
352.96 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
119th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
118th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Namibia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199520072020

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 352.96 million real chained 2019 US$ against 328.04 million real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 24.91 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 119th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 118th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 408.74 million real chained 2019 US$ 368.55 million real chained 2019 US$ 40.19 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 382.43 million real chained 2019 US$ 363.09 million real chained 2019 US$ 19.34 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 347.34 million real chained 2019 US$ 356.54 million real chained 2019 US$ 9.20 million real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 328.04 million real chained 2019 US$ 352.96 million real chained 2019 US$ 24.91 million real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Namibia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 352.96 million real chained 2019 US$ against 328.04 million real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago?
24.91 million real chained 2019 US$, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Namibia ranks 119th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 118th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/namibia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/namibia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed