Mongolia vs Rwanda: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Mongolia
444.73 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Rwanda
469.18 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mongolia rank
113th
Rwanda rank
111th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Mongolia
  • Rwanda
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 469.18 million real chained 2019 US$ against 444.73 million real chained 2019 US$ in Mongolia, a difference of 24.45 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 113th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 151 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 448.42 million real chained 2019 US$ 503.18 million real chained 2019 US$ 54.76 million real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2000s 446.46 million real chained 2019 US$ 471.05 million real chained 2019 US$ 24.59 million real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2010s 444.92 million real chained 2019 US$ 458.81 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.89 million real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2020s 444.73 million real chained 2019 US$ 469.18 million real chained 2019 US$ 24.45 million real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Mongolia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 469.18 million real chained 2019 US$ against 444.73 million real chained 2019 US$ in Mongolia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Mongolia and Rwanda?
24.45 million real chained 2019 US$, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Rwanda rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Mongolia ranks 113th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Rwanda: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/mongolia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/mongolia/rwanda/">Mongolia vs Rwanda: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed