Moldova vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Moldova
387.42 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
328.04 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Moldova rank
117th
Namibia rank
119th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Moldova
  • Namibia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199520072020

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 387.42 million real chained 2019 US$ against 328.04 million real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 59.38 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Moldova's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Moldova ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 119th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 339.51 million real chained 2019 US$ 408.74 million real chained 2019 US$ 69.23 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 358.80 million real chained 2019 US$ 382.43 million real chained 2019 US$ 23.63 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 383.79 million real chained 2019 US$ 347.34 million real chained 2019 US$ 36.44 million real chained 2019 US$ Moldova
2020s 387.42 million real chained 2019 US$ 328.04 million real chained 2019 US$ 59.38 million real chained 2019 US$ Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Moldova or Namibia?
Moldova, at 387.42 million real chained 2019 US$ against 328.04 million real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Moldova and Namibia?
59.38 million real chained 2019 US$, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Moldova and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Moldova ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 119th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/moldova/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/moldova/namibia/">Moldova vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed