Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Guinea-Bissau
13.85 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malawi
44.74 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
140th
Malawi rank
137th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Malawi
20.0M40.0M60.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 44.74 million real chained 2019 US$ against 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 30.89 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 3.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 140th and Malawi ranks 137th of 151 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 15.21 million real chained 2019 US$ 64.02 million real chained 2019 US$ 48.81 million real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2000s 14.77 million real chained 2019 US$ 57.73 million real chained 2019 US$ 42.97 million real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2010s 14.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 49.35 million real chained 2019 US$ 35.18 million real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2020s 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ 44.74 million real chained 2019 US$ 30.89 million real chained 2019 US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Guinea-Bissau or Malawi?
Malawi, at 44.74 million real chained 2019 US$ against 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Guinea-Bissau and Malawi?
30.89 million real chained 2019 US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 140th and Malawi ranks 137th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/guinea-bissau/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/guinea-bissau/malawi/">Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed