Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Eswatini
10.54 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
13.85 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Eswatini rank
142nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
140th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
05.0M10.0M15.0M199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ against 10.54 million real chained 2019 US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 3.31 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 142nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 140th of 151 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 9.95 million real chained 2019 US$ 15.21 million real chained 2019 US$ 5.26 million real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 10.14 million real chained 2019 US$ 14.77 million real chained 2019 US$ 4.63 million real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 10.40 million real chained 2019 US$ 14.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 3.78 million real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 10.54 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ 3.31 million real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ against 10.54 million real chained 2019 US$ in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
3.31 million real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Eswatini ranks 142nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 140th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed