Egypt vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Egypt
44.51 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malawi
44.74 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
138th
Malawi rank
137th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Egypt
  • Malawi
020.0M40.0M60.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 44.74 million real chained 2019 US$ against 44.51 million real chained 2019 US$ in Egypt, a difference of 228,000 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malawi ahead.

Egypt ranks 138th and Malawi ranks 137th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 54.02 million real chained 2019 US$ 64.02 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.00 million real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2000s 61.46 million real chained 2019 US$ 57.73 million real chained 2019 US$ 3.72 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2010s 51.67 million real chained 2019 US$ 49.35 million real chained 2019 US$ 2.32 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2020s 44.51 million real chained 2019 US$ 44.74 million real chained 2019 US$ 228,000 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Egypt or Malawi?
Malawi, at 44.74 million real chained 2019 US$ against 44.51 million real chained 2019 US$ in Egypt as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Egypt and Malawi?
228,000 real chained 2019 US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Egypt and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Egypt ranks 138th and Malawi ranks 137th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/egypt-arab-rep/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/egypt-arab-rep/malawi/">Egypt vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed