Egypt vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Egypt
44.51 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
13.85 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
138th
Guinea-Bissau rank
140th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Egypt
  • Guinea-Bissau
20.0M40.0M60.0M199520072020

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 44.51 million real chained 2019 US$ against 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 30.66 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Egypt's figure about 3.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 138th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 140th of 151 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 54.02 million real chained 2019 US$ 15.21 million real chained 2019 US$ 38.81 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2000s 61.46 million real chained 2019 US$ 14.77 million real chained 2019 US$ 46.69 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2010s 51.67 million real chained 2019 US$ 14.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 37.49 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2020s 44.51 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ 30.66 million real chained 2019 US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Egypt or Guinea-Bissau?
Egypt, at 44.51 million real chained 2019 US$ against 13.85 million real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Egypt and Guinea-Bissau?
30.66 million real chained 2019 US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Egypt and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Egypt ranks 138th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 140th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/egypt-arab-rep/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/egypt-arab-rep/guinea-bissau/">Egypt vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed