Ecuador vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Ecuador
1.67 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
1.47 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
79th
Serbia rank
82nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Ecuador
  • Serbia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.67 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 1.47 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 202.89 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 79th and Serbia ranks 82nd of 151 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.76 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.44 billion real chained 2019 US$ 325.24 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 1.72 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.47 billion real chained 2019 US$ 248.00 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 1.67 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.47 billion real chained 2019 US$ 202.89 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Ecuador or Serbia?
Ecuador, at 1.67 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 1.47 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Ecuador and Serbia?
202.89 million real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Ecuador ranks 79th and Serbia ranks 82nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/ecuador/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/ecuador/serbia/">Ecuador vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed