Croatia vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Croatia
6.65 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
6.65 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
39th
South Africa rank
40th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Croatia
  • South Africa
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199520072020

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 6.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 6.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa, a difference of 4.61 million real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Croatia ranks 39th and South Africa ranks 40th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 6.43 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.98 billion real chained 2019 US$ 543.59 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 6.52 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.87 billion real chained 2019 US$ 347.06 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 6.61 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.73 billion real chained 2019 US$ 121.05 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 6.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.61 million real chained 2019 US$ Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Croatia or South Africa?
Croatia, at 6.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 6.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Croatia and South Africa?
4.61 million real chained 2019 US$, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Croatia and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Croatia ranks 39th and South Africa ranks 40th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/croatia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/croatia/south-africa/">Croatia vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed