Congo vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Congo
7.87 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Philippines
8.46 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
32nd
Philippines rank
31st

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Congo
  • Philippines
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199520072020

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 8.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 7.87 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 596.16 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 32nd and Philippines ranks 31st of 151 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 7.97 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.77 billion real chained 2019 US$ 801.89 million real chained 2019 US$ Philippines
2000s 7.94 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.36 billion real chained 2019 US$ 419.59 million real chained 2019 US$ Philippines
2010s 7.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ 343.73 million real chained 2019 US$ Philippines
2020s 7.87 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ 596.16 million real chained 2019 US$ Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Congo or Philippines?
Philippines, at 8.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 7.87 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Congo and Philippines?
596.16 million real chained 2019 US$, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Philippines?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Philippines rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Congo ranks 32nd and Philippines ranks 31st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/congo-rep/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/congo-rep/philippines/">Congo vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed