Botswana vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Botswana
519.69 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan
527.80 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Botswana rank
109th
Kyrgyzstan rank
108th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Botswana
  • Kyrgyzstan
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 527.80 million real chained 2019 US$ against 519.69 million real chained 2019 US$ in Botswana, a difference of 8.11 million real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 109th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 108th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 612.39 million real chained 2019 US$ 468.49 million real chained 2019 US$ 143.90 million real chained 2019 US$ Botswana
2000s 582.16 million real chained 2019 US$ 482.65 million real chained 2019 US$ 99.51 million real chained 2019 US$ Botswana
2010s 541.86 million real chained 2019 US$ 503.07 million real chained 2019 US$ 38.78 million real chained 2019 US$ Botswana
2020s 519.69 million real chained 2019 US$ 527.80 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.11 million real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Botswana or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 527.80 million real chained 2019 US$ against 519.69 million real chained 2019 US$ in Botswana as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Botswana and Kyrgyzstan?
8.11 million real chained 2019 US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kyrgyzstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Botswana and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Botswana ranks 109th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 108th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/botswana/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/botswana/kyrgyz-republic/">Botswana vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed