Belgium vs Congo: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Belgium
7.78 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo
7.87 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
33rd
Congo rank
32nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Belgium
  • Congo
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 7.87 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 7.78 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Belgium, a difference of 87.43 million real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 33rd and Congo ranks 32nd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 8.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.97 billion real chained 2019 US$ 571.70 million real chained 2019 US$ Belgium
2000s 7.64 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.94 billion real chained 2019 US$ 290.97 million real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 7.78 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ 112.06 million real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 7.78 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.87 billion real chained 2019 US$ 87.43 million real chained 2019 US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Belgium or Congo?
Congo, at 7.87 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 7.78 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Belgium as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Belgium and Congo?
87.43 million real chained 2019 US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belgium and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Belgium ranks 33rd and Congo ranks 32nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Congo: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/belgium/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/belgium/congo-rep/">Belgium vs Congo: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed