Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Bangladesh
287.44 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
208.97 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bangladesh rank
123rd
Zimbabwe rank
125th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 287.44 million real chained 2019 US$ against 208.97 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 78.48 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 151 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 293.08 million real chained 2019 US$ 221.66 million real chained 2019 US$ 71.42 million real chained 2019 US$ Bangladesh
2000s 290.88 million real chained 2019 US$ 217.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 73.36 million real chained 2019 US$ Bangladesh
2010s 287.67 million real chained 2019 US$ 212.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 75.67 million real chained 2019 US$ Bangladesh
2020s 287.44 million real chained 2019 US$ 208.97 million real chained 2019 US$ 78.48 million real chained 2019 US$ Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Bangladesh or Zimbabwe?
Bangladesh, at 287.44 million real chained 2019 US$ against 208.97 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
78.48 million real chained 2019 US$, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bangladesh and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Bangladesh ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/bangladesh/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/bangladesh/zimbabwe/">Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed