Australia vs Germany: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Australia
35.25 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Germany
42.91 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
12th
Germany rank
9th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Australia
  • Germany
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B199520072020

How they compare

Germany currently reports 42.91 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 35.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Australia, a difference of 7.66 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 12th and Germany ranks 9th of 151 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Germany Difference Ahead
1990s 34.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ 42.61 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.77 billion real chained 2019 US$ Germany
2000s 34.41 billion real chained 2019 US$ 42.76 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.35 billion real chained 2019 US$ Germany
2010s 34.83 billion real chained 2019 US$ 42.90 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.07 billion real chained 2019 US$ Germany
2020s 35.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ 42.91 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.66 billion real chained 2019 US$ Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Australia or Germany?
Germany, at 42.91 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 35.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Australia and Germany?
7.66 billion real chained 2019 US$, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Germany?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Germany rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Australia ranks 12th and Germany ranks 9th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Germany: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/australia/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-real-chained/australia/germany/">Australia vs Germany: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed