Sweden vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Sweden
33.83 billion current US$
in 2020
Zambia
17.97 billion current US$
in 2020
Sweden rank
9th
Zambia rank
12th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Sweden
  • Zambia
010.0B20.0B30.0B199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 33.83 billion current US$ against 17.97 billion current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 15.86 billion current US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.9 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.

Sweden ranks 9th and Zambia ranks 12th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 3.37 billion current US$ 3.57 billion current US$ 206.46 million current US$ Zambia
2000s 5.93 billion current US$ 5.33 billion current US$ 600.56 million current US$ Sweden
2010s 27.93 billion current US$ 11.49 billion current US$ 16.44 billion current US$ Sweden
2020s 33.83 billion current US$ 17.97 billion current US$ 15.86 billion current US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Sweden or Zambia?
Sweden, at 33.83 billion current US$ against 17.97 billion current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Sweden and Zambia?
15.86 billion current US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Sweden and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Sweden ranks 9th and Zambia ranks 12th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/sweden/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/sweden/zambia/">Sweden vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed