Sudan vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing
Sudan
11.33 billion current US$
in 2020
Zambia
17.97 billion current US$
in 2020
Sudan rank
15th
Zambia rank
12th
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 17.97 billion current US$ against 11.33 billion current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 6.63 billion current US$.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.6 times Sudan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 15th and Zambia ranks 12th of 149 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.90 billion current US$ | 12.64 billion current US$ | 10.74 billion current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 11.33 billion current US$ | 17.97 billion current US$ | 6.63 billion current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Sudan or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 17.97 billion current US$ against 11.33 billion current US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Sudan and Zambia?
- 6.63 billion current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
- Sudan ranks 15th and Zambia ranks 12th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.